Public Health Ethics Advance Access originally published online on March 1, 2009
Public Health Ethics 2009 2(1):45-52; doi:10.1093/phe/php004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ethics and Epidemiology: The Income Debate
Duke University
* Corresponding author: Gopal Sreenivasan, 201 West Duke Building, Box 90743, Durham NC USA 27708. Email: gopal.sreenivasan{at}duke.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
This paper reviews the epidemiological debate between the relative income hypothesis and the absolute income hypothesis. The dispute between these rival hypotheses has to do with whether an adequate account of the relationship between income and life expectancy requires the definition of income to include any comparative element. I discuss the evidence offered for the relative hypothesis (which answers, yes), as well as two important criticisms that have been levelled against this evidence. I also offer some critical reflections on the debate from a philosophical standpoint concerned with the ethics of population health. Both hypotheses agree that a redistribution of income towards the worst off will improve their life expectancy.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Sreenivasan Ethics and Epidemiology: Residual Health Inequalities Public Health Ethics, October 13, 2009; (2009) php030v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
